4. If such negotiations do not lead to an agreement within six months of the date on which the Danish Government has informed the Norwegian Government in accordance with paragraph 2, the matter may, at the request of one of the Parties, be referred to a Council composed of two representatives of each Party, and an arbitrator whom the parties jointly request the Swedish Government to appoint in the absence of an agreement. The Board may, if a decision cannot be taken before the expiry of the period referred to in paragraph 2 and otherwise seems appropriate, agree on a temporary postponement of the termination of the agreement referred to in Article 1, but not beyond the date referred to in paragraph 1 of that Article. The resolutions of the Board of Directors are recognized as binding by the parties. While it is far from clear that these other four governments would support the opening of negotiations on such an agreement – Russia in particular has expressed significant doubts about the need or even the advisability of progress – the US has invited delegations from these states to Washington for a formal round of talks. After a few more meetings between these delegations, they reached agreement on a non-binding declaration known as the Declaration on the Prevention of Unregulated Deep-Sea Fishing in the Central Arctic Ocean, signed in Oslo in 2015. The APPDF is based on the principles of the EU`s Common Fisheries Policy (CFP) and is also in line with Greenland legislation. Alongside these domestic developments, the United States has begun urging its immediate Arctic neighbors – Russia and Canada – to consider the possibility of an international agreement to prevent or delay commercial fishing in the high seas of the central Arctic Ocean. These discussions eventually extended to Norway and the Kingdom of Denmark. Each Party shall now initiate the legislative procedures necessary for the signature and conclusion of the new Agreement and its Implementing Protocol.
Fishing opportunities have been negotiated for the same species as in the current Protocol (cod, redfish, turbot, northern shrimp, capelin and pomegranate). Fishing opportunities for mackerel have also been included in the agreement at TAC level of 0. Any quota of mackerel transferred from Greenland in the future will be subject to Greenland`s signature with the EU of the agreement on the division of coastal states on mackerel management. The reference prices have also been updated, taking into account a methodology agreed between the two parties and the respective market prices. On the basis of the renegotiated fishing opportunities and reference prices, the EU will grant Greenland an annual financial contribution of EUR 16 500 000. A significant part of this contribution, EUR 2 900 000 per year, is specifically intended to promote the development of the fisheries sector in Greenland. For the entire duration of the Protocol, the estimated value is EUR 99 000 000. In addition, EU shipowners pay fees for fishing opportunities.
1. Where it appears that it has been demonstrated that the arrangements referred to in Article 1 have adverse effects on fishing for the population residing in Greenland, the Agreement may be terminated before the end of the abovementioned period, unless such termination takes effect before 10 July 1972. and at the same time continues to contribute to the development of the fisheries sector in Greenland. The agreement is another important step in the eu`s long-standing bilateral cooperation in the fisheries sector and renews their commitment to promoting the sustainable use of marine resources. It is the only Joint Partnership Agreement on Sustainable Fisheries (JFP) in the North Atlantic and the third most important agreement for the EU in financial terms. It will allow the EU fleet (12 large industrial trawlers) to continue fishing in Greenland waters for a period of 4 years and 2 years, while continuing to contribute to the development of the fisheries sector in Greenland. According to the European Commission, the agreement is ”another important step” in the long-standing bilateral cooperation between the EU and Greenland on fisheries issues and renews its commitment to promote the sustainable use of marine resources. The agreement covers a period of four years with the possibility of a two-year extension. The need for a new agreement arose from the expiry of the previous Fisheries Partnership Agreement (FPA) on 30 December 2020. The EU`s intention was also to amend certain provisions of Regulation (EU) No 1380/2013 on the Common Fisheries Policy (CFP), which is not covered by the Fisheries Partnership Agreement. The only mixed cooperation agreement in the North Atlantic and the third largest agreement in financial terms for the EU will allow the EU fleet – consisting of 12 large industrial trawlers – to continue fishing in Greenland waters for a period of four years (with a potential of two additional years) while continuing to contribute to the development of Greenland`s fisheries sector.
Based on the renegotiated fishing opportunities and reference prices, the EU will provide Greenland with an annual financial contribution of €16.5 million ($20.1 million), of which €2.9 million ($3.5 million) per year is specifically earmarked to support fisheries development in Greenland. The new Sustainable Fisheries Partnership Agreement signed today significantly strengthens cooperation on the surveillance, control and surveillance of fishing activities. The Agreement is based on the principles of the Common Fisheries Policy, such as transparency, management of fishing activities, non-discrimination, respect for scientific advice and scientific cooperation in data collection and analysis. It is also in line with Greenland legislation and management and scientific measures taken within the framework of international organizations. According to the Commission, the agreement reached in January and officially signed on 22 April marks ”a new stage” in the eu`s long-standing fisheries relationship with the EU and Greenland and ”reaffirms and underlines” both sides` commitment to the sustainable use of marine resources. The 8. In January 2021, the EU and Greenland concluded negotiations on a new Sustainable Fisheries Partnership Agreement (FRPA) and a new protocol that will strengthen their cooperation in the fisheries sector for the next four years, with the possibility of a two-year extension. From the U.S.
perspective, efforts to develop the deal represent an unusual merger of interests. When the idea for the agreement took shape, U.S. government consultations between representatives of the State of Alaska, the Alaska Congressional Delegation, the North Pacific Fisheries Management Board, the relevant portion of the U.S. fishing industry, Alaska Native communities, the U.S. environmental community, and U.S. scientific panels showed support for the same fundamental approach among all (perhaps a first in International History Fisheries Issues Involving the United States). States). This confluence of interests largely explains why the United States the government`s policy in promoting the agreement has remained consistent between two Republican administrations and two Democratic administrations. The agreement was concluded in January and officially signed today.
It marks a new stage in the long-standing fisheries relationship between the EU and Greenland. It reaffirms and underlines our shared commitment to the sustainable use of marine resources. This agreement will allow the EU fleet to continue fishing in Greenland waters for a period of four to six years, while continuing to contribute to the development of greenland`s fisheries sector. This new APPS represents an important milestone in the EU-Greenland partnership, which dates back to 1985. The new agreement respects the principles of the Common Fisheries Policy, such as transparency, management of fishing activities, non-discrimination, respect for scientific advice and scientific cooperation in data collection and analysis. It complies with greenland legislation and management and scientific measures taken within the framework of the Northwest Atlantic Fisheries Organization (NAFO), the North-East Atlantic Fisheries Commission (NEAFC) and the International Council for the Exploration of the Sea (ICES). The new APPS will further strengthen cooperation on the surveillance, control and surveillance of fishing activities. The second fundamental obligation of Parties is to establish a common scientific research and monitoring programme for the Central Arctic Ocean: ”with the aim of improving their understanding of the ecosystems of the Convention area and, in particular, to determine whether there may be fish stocks in the Convention area now or in the future that could be sustainably exploited and the possible impact of these fisheries on ecosystems. of the Convention area” (Agreement, Article 4). As we mentioned earlier, the agreement has had a pull period of more than a decade. Congress passed a joint resolution signed by President George W. Bush calling for the negotiation of such an agreement.
Soon after, the United States adopted its first Arctic Fisheries Management Plan, which essentially banned commercial fishing in the U.S. Exclusive Economic Zone north of Alaska – in part because of a lack of scientific evidence needed for a successful fishery. Why should these governments agree not to allow commercial fishing in this vast and increasingly accessible maritime space? They did so largely because they don`t know enough about the ecosystems in this part of the ocean to have a reliable basis for succeeding, that is, sustainably, the commercial fishery there. .